Characteristics of imprisonment in the nineteenth century Essay

Characteristics of imprisonment in the nineteenth century - Essay ExampleCharacteristics of imprisonment in the nineteenth centuryDuring the 17th century, prison was any place that the offenders were held temporary hookup awaiting the punishment. During the 17th century, London Bridewell theater of operations was constructed as a prototype prison that could hold the disorderly poor in order to strike the habits of work through prison labour. The 19th century witnessed the implementation of the first state prison that was the subject penitentiary at Millbank in London. The prisoners were kept in separate cells, but were allowed to associate during the day. Pentoville prions was constructed in 1842 with cells measurement 13 feet long, 9 feet high and 7 feet in width and operated a separate system that entailed cave man confinement of the prisoners. Peels Gaol Act of 1823 had separated the prisons depending on the status of the offender. The prisoners were confined in a separate c ell and were tied with rope and communication to other prisoners was impossible. Select Committee of the polarity of Lords recommended for the appointment of prison Inspectorate and implementation of silent prison system. The first stage of silent system was lonely confinement for a period of up to nine months that was coupled with hard labour and prayers in the cells. The sulfur penal stage was the provision of sleep and meals in a separate cell, but the prisoner would be allowed to work with the rest of prisoners. The third stage was consisted the conditional release on account of good stock and constant police supervision. Under the silent system, food was monotonous, beds were replaced with hammocks in order to cause the offender awake nights and hard labour entailed Oakum picking in order to separate the fibres of an old ships ropes for reuse.... These systems entailed a lot of brutal punishment methods such as electric shocks, starvation and plugging of prisoners in boil ing water. However, umpteen boroughs decided to give up their prisons instead of incurring higher expenses of maintaining the prisoners (Emsley 89). In 1877, the prisons were nationalized and came under the control of prison house Commission. The Prison Commission was of the view that restructuring was essential in order to reduce the number of prisons and stop reoffending. The Prison Commission asserted its won control of prisons and standardised the regulations of all prisons thus leading to uniformity. Conclusion I agree with Sidney and Beatrice that the nineteenth century prison policy was ultimately the fetish of uniformity. After the course of Prison Act of 1865, the Prison Commission implemented measures of standardizing services offered to prisoners including the quality of food, the number of labour hours and ensured that prisoners wore uniforms while in the cells. In addition, the prisons employed new qualified personnel such as psychologists, caseworkers and welfare off icers who were tasked with providing direction services and providing treatment to the prisoners. By mid 1890s, the Prison Commission had successfully implemented uniformity, efficiency in administration and welfare services in prisons. The 1898 Prison Act gave the Secretary of State to make rules presidential term prisons and a Board of Independent Visitors for every convict prison was established (Emsley 113). Question (b). When we look back, cargo ships captures our contemporary attention as a sensible, colourful and almost exciting way of dealing with drab offenders. But with the benefit of hindsight, we can appreciate